In a recent, little-publicized international arbitration decision, an intergovernmental dispute resolution body ruled on September 20, 2020 that Netherlands-based Vodafone was not liable for an estimated $2.2 billion tax bill demanded by the Government of India and that India had violated the “fair and equitable” treatment provisions under a 1995 bilateral investment treaty between India and the Netherlands. The case, titled Vodafone International Holdings BV v. The Republic of India was initiated in 2014 before the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), an international body based in The Hague.
The long story of the case underscores the importance of understanding political risk for those doing business overseas. Country-specific efforts to balance investment promotion with the need to generate tax revenue can lead to legal changes that can either unlock opportunities or increase risks for investors. Additionally, the case shows how bilateral trade and investment treaties (BITs) create legal mechanisms that can be utilized to adjudicate disputes such as the one between Vodafone and India.
In this instance, India’s attempts to capture revenue from international investment transactions led it to pass legislation allowing transactions to be taxed retroactively, leading to drawn-out legal disputes with Vodafone and other companies. Beginning in 2007, Indian tax authorities had unsuccessfully sound to levy taxes on Vodafone after its roughly $11 billion purchase of the Indian mobile phone company Hutchison Essar Limited (HEL). After legal appeals by Vodafone, India’s Supreme Court held in January 2012 that Vodafone’s acquisition of HEL was not liable for taxes under India’s Income Tax Act of 1961.
In response to the Supreme Court decision, the Indian parliament passed the Finance Act of 2012, which amended the Tax Act of 1961 and gave its government authority to retroactively tax past transactions. With a new law in force, India again sought to levy the tax fee against Vodafone plus interest and penalties totaling roughly $3.79 billion.
Citing the 1995 bilateral trade and investment treaty between India and the Netherlands, Vodafone invoked the treaty’s arbitration provisions in April 2014, bringing the case before the PCA. Some six years later, under the authority granted to it by the India-Netherlands BIT, the PCA ruled in favor of Vodafone, ordering India to stop seeking tax payments from Vodafone and pay Vodafone over $4 million in legal fees. The Vodafone case is one of three cases before the PCA in the wake of India’s retroactive attempts to collect tax under the Finance Act of 2012.
Political Risk and Remedies
It remains to be seen how the PCA’s decision will be enforced. Just before the PCA ruling, India’s Supreme Court had ruled against Vodafone, upholding the India’s efforts to collect revenue under the 2012 Finance Act. These extensive and costly proceedings highlight just some of the potential difficulties that companies face when doing business overseas in countries where shifting political priorities can put investments or agreements at risk. Solid political risk analysis, trusted legal counsel, and political risk insurance are all tools companies need to navigate global trade and investment.
Bilateral trade and investment treaties (called BITs), such as that between the Netherlands and India in 1995, are important legal instruments to understand and utilize. BITs include agreed upon language to protect investments and encourage fair and transparent legal treatment of transactions and contracts.
In addition, BITs often create procedures, such as international arbitration, for disputes that cannot be settled in domestic courts.
U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA) maintains a list of BITs between the U.S. and other countries.
Since 2004, Securitas Global Risk Solutions (“Securitas”) has helped clients across the United States develop credit and political risk transfer solutions that provides value on several levels. As a specialty independent trade credit and political risk insurance broker, Securitas is focused on developing comprehensive solutions that meet the needs of their clients, ensures complete understanding of policy wording and delivers responsive excellent customer service.
Expropriation should always be a consideration for any business with overseas operations and investments....
LVMH Legal Case A dispute between luxury goods brands Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton (LVMH) and Tiffany & Co....
In mid-February, during the height of the Coronavirus crisis in China, the China Council for the Promotion of...