10-Year Low in Private Equity Funding

Kirk ElkenApr 2, 2026Non-Industry
10-Year Low in Private Equity Funding

Summary

  • Private-equity firms globally raised $408 billion last year, the lowest annual total since 2016.
  • Liquidity is still the choke point: a large backlog of unsold assets and weak cash distributions are slowing capital recycling and keeping new commitments harder to secure.
  • For sellers to middle-market PE-backed buyers, the practical risks center on working-capital behavior (terms, disputes, approvals) and refinancing timing, not just top-line demand.

 

10-Year Low in Private Equity Funding: What the Sources Say

Private equity funding is being framed as a 10-year low, even with isolated mega-fund closes. In reporting on KKR’s latest raise, the Wall Street Journal notes KKR closed a $23 billion North America-focused fund, that fundraising began in June 2024, and that KKR said the close brings total capital raised across its most recent flagship regional vintages to $46 billion. The same WSJ report cites PitchBook data that global PE firms raised $408 billion last year, the lowest annual sum since 2016, and describes the environment as the worst fundraising backdrop in nearly a decade.

The common thread behind weaker fundraising is liquidity. The WSJ attributes the slow recovery to a “lack of liquidity and a “glut of fund managers”, with investors hesitant to commit more until firms sell down a large backlog of portfolio companies. In parallel, PYMNTS (citing Bloomberg and Bain) reports the industry is sitting on $3.8 trillion in unsold assets and that firms returned fewer profits to investors for a fourth consecutive year, reinforcing why “cash back” remains constrained.

Distribution math matters because it influences how much flexibility sponsors and portfolio companies have when conditions tighten. PYMNTS reports distributions at 14% of NAV in 2025 (second-lowest since the 2008 financial crisis, per Bain), which keeps many limited partners in “wait for cash” mode rather than “add commitments” mode. PYMNTS also notes that while deal value rose to $904 billion in 2025 (up 44% from 2024), total transactions fell 6%, suggesting activity isn’t automatically translating into clean liquidity relief.

Exit data points in the same direction. S&P Global Market Intelligence reports exit volume rose 5.4% to 3,149 exits in 2025, while announced exit value fell 21.2% to $412.07 billion from $523.12 billion in 2024. S&P also links lower realized returns to the post-2022 rate environment, higher borrowing costs give buyers leverage to negotiate lower prices, affecting sellers’ proceeds.

Put together, the outlook is cohesive: weaker fundraising (WSJ/PitchBook) plus constrained distributions (PYMNTS) plus lower exit value (S&P) equals a slower capital-recycling loop, especially outside the largest managers.

 

Implications for selling to middle-market PE-backed companies

What typically changes for vendors and counterparties is working-capital behavior:

  • Terms and approval friction can increase as cash conservation becomes a lever in a low-distribution environment.
  • Order patterns can become more volatile (smaller lots, tighter reorder points, delayed greenlights) when management is optimizing cash conversion while exits clear at lower aggregate value.
  • Event risk rises around refinancing and asset sales: S&P’s “more exits, less value” dynamic implies more portfolio actions at less favorable pricing, which can sharpen near-term cash priorities.

The credit takeaway is pragmatic: when private equity funding is at a 10-year low, payment outcomes become more sensitive to liquidity cycles and sponsor-specific capacity. Limit-setting and terms should lean more on observed cash behavior (days-to-pay, dispute frequency, ordering cadence) than on the presence of a sponsor alone.

 

Conclusion

Concerned about a credit in your portfolio? Contact Us to learn how you can protect your business.

 

Disclaimer

This blog post is meant to be informative and provide helpful tips and insights into credit insurance policies.  It is not meant to supersede any policy requirements.  Please consult your credit insurance policy for all requirements including claim filing deadlines and required documentation.

Since 2004, Securitas Global Risk Solutions, LLC (“Securitas”) has helped clients develop trade credit and political risk transfer solutions that provide value on numerous levels. As an independent trade credit and political risk insurance brokerage, Securitas is focused on developing comprehensive solutions that meet the needs of clients, ensuring a complete understanding of policy wording and delivering excellent responsive service.

About Author

Kirk Elken

Kirk Elken

Kirk is a co-founder of Securitas Global Risk Solutions. He specializes in developing trade credit and political risk insurance solutions tailored to client needs. With expertise in risk management and financial protection, he helps businesses safeguard their receivables, gain access to additional working capital and increase sales. He is passionate about trade credit insurance and enjoys writing about his experiences over 20 years working with clients.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.